Contemporary vs. traditional of architecture design Essay

Contemporary vs. traditional of architecture design - Essay Example 3. Technology as an expression of architects is an extremely important theme. B. Traditional Architecture 1. Traditional architectural styles tend to focus on Greco-Roman aesthetics 2. Frank Lloyd Wright is an architect that married traditional architectural naturalism with modern elements that can be discussed in terms of the growing industrialism of the time. 3. Wright can be seen as part of the transition between naturalism and the Greco-Roman ideal to a more industrialized vision of architectural style. C. Architecture and Modern Life 1. One of the ways in which the development of modern identities has occurred is through the reflection of the post-industrial world in modern architecture. 2. An example of a building that was constructed in order to establish the Indian identity and create a modern example of the new economic position that India was creating was Chandigarh build by Le Corbusier. 3. India can also provide the debate against the homogenization of architectural style . 4. Most cultures are embracing the new aesthetics in architecture, however, and are supporting the construction of symbols of consumerism within their nations III. Conclusion Contemporary Architecture versus Traditional Architectural Design Name Class Date Contemporary Architecture versus Traditional Architectural Design Introduction Contemporary architectural design is a reflection of the post-industrial world with buildings being designed and constructed that reflect the modern, digital age. Contemporary architecture reflects a complexity in its design, integrating the need for sustainability and environmental responsibility through the appeal of technological solutions to those problems. Traditional architecture is typically reflective of the order and symmetry that can be found in Greco-Roman design influences, using natural materials and integrating the natural world into the works. Architects such as Frank Lloyd Wright can be shown to be a bridge between the traditional elem ents and the contemporary aesthetics with industrialized lines being expressed through the use of natural materials as opposed to steel and concrete. One of the problems with contemporary architecture, however, is that it is having a homogenizing effect as cities around the world are embracing the same types of post-industrial aesthetics as are found in Western, primarily American, urban centers. This has created a melding of cultures so that one city is almost indistinguishable from the next and culture identity has become all but washed away. Despite this effect, the homogenization of cities across the world is representative of the emergence of cultures from colonialism, their European conquerors now gone and their independence placing them in a position to have a space within the world economy. Although there are still some modern architects who embrace traditional styles of design, most modern, urban dwellers are embracing the post-industrial aesthetics of contemporary architec ture as it represents independence and economic power in the new world economy. Contemporary Design Author Kiel Moe (2008) identifies the concepts that support contemporary design for its complexity, composition, and integration. He discusses the integration of complex systems that begin at the design stage where clients, construction teams and the architect all evaluate how the system of the build needs to work and extends that to how the environment and the systems supporting that environment and work together in a post-modern world